overidon.com Central Database for Overidon Omnimedia

February 25, 2014

Deus Ex shall yield a Human Revolution

Filed under: Gaming,Reviews — Tyler @ 11:25 pm
Eliza and Jensen

Eliza and Jensen

I cannot believe this game was made. Eidos Montreal and SquareEnix truly outdid themselves on this masterpiece.

Although this is a game review, there will be a great deal of analysis included in this article. So please note:

POTENTIAL SPOILER ALERT.

One of my best buddies recommended that I play the original Deus Ex back in the year 2001. I loved it.

The adventure, the discussions with shady characters about quite frankly outlandish and scary subject-matter…it all made sense.

It was the stuff that surpassed a good movie. It made you feel like you were IN a good movie.

Deus Ex the Invisible War was an extremely fun experience. It had a similar interface to the original in some ways, but it seemed like a simplified game. Although the story and dialogue was excellent. I also loved that Invisible War was a direct sequel to the original. It definitely did justice and although it felt like a short game, it was extremely fun.

But Deus Ex: Human Revolution…WHOA, this game goes way above the call of duty. It is a prequel to the original Deus Ex. But it feels more like a sturdy addition to the Deus Ex cannon and future history. Well done doesn’t even make sense when discussing this game.

There were some simplifications in this game. For example, your weapon modifications and damage upgrades were simplified from mathematical, to a simple hash-mark chart. Although this system works well, it takes some of the hard-core RPG elements from the game. I personally think it would have been better if they added a secondary, “Advanced Details” section to the weapon information. But the new direction that games are heading in is towards wide-scale user appeal, and that requires some sacrifice. Also, since Deus Ex: Human Revolution was made for PC, XBOX 360 and PS3 it makes sense that they simplified some details. I’m not complaining, it’s just that detailed stats is the only thing that kept this game from being a freak-out gem.

Similarly to the original, you have the choices of lethal and non-lethal combat. One interesting factor is that the melee combat was overhauled to incorporate your energy system. If you get close enough to an enemy you can do either a lethal or non-lethal takedown. The cool part is that each time this happens a mini-custom cutscene occurs that looks absolutely awesome.

On to more esoteric stuff:

I do not feel embarrassed about being a man in my 30’s playing computer games anymore. If you actually read the little, “E-Books” that appear throughout the game, and if you take the time to read the “Hacked E-Mails” you will have acquired immense knowledge about technology and International Politics. You will be able to satisfy basic conversations about the most compelling subject matter imaginable. And even though you learned it with a game with fictional characters and made-up names for corporations and products…the concepts are all based on real technology and real ideas that are being passed around future-tech circles both online and offline.

For example: There are E-Books that discuss everything from how hearing aids really work, through emails that discuss the inner workings of thought control.

Think this is just a game? Nope. It’s your homework. And the people who don’t do their homework oftentime end up doing someone else’s homework…permanently.

In the picture above you see the hero on the right, Adam Jensen talking with Eliza Cassan. She’s talking about how she was created to monitor and INFLUENCE the media. Does she have the power to do so?

Well, if you played though the original game, you’d know all about Echelon and the Aquinas Hub. This goes way beyond media control. Eliza Cassan wants certain messages being discussed, and other ones squelched. There definitely were people pulling the strings, and she’s by no means a final boss. But she’s a key player.

As an AI she has tremendous analytical power. But you find out later about the Hyron Project.

I read several in-game E-Books and saw how the Hyron Project was a quantum computer. This computer I guess was originally built in conjunction with a project to “seed” the ocean floor with iron. This iron would in-turn feed micro-organisms. And these micro-organisms would eventually help the Earth recover from greenhouse gasses and potentially save us from catastrophic global warming.

The idea of the Hyron Project seemed interesting, but I wasn’t sure why they’d need a Quantum Computer for that kind of technology.

Since quantum computers can basically learn about the future, they are far too powerful for a simple project like dealing with nodules and other tasks for regular linked super-computers.

Then I realized, the quantum Hyron Project computer was actually intended for the transcendence which is implied at the end of the original Deus Ex if you choose the Helios ending. And it is also related to the Helios ending choice of the Invisible War.

Hmm, why would these game programmers be so interested in merging with an AI system? What’s the big-deal about this transcendence stuff?
There’s even a new movie starring Johnny Depp coming out called, “Transcendence” and it deals with this whole bigger than life-AI-computer-blobification.

Honestly, I think there are people that are so afraid of dying, that they will go to any means and any lengths to quite literally, “stay in the game.” That’s all it is people. Life is a game. Don’t stress about it.

Here’s something to munch on.

If the Matrix was real based on the Matrix movies. Then remember the AI architect from the 2nd movie? In response to Neo saying, “You need us.” Meaning, the machines need humans for power, the architect responded, “There are levels of survival we are willing to accept.”

Wait a minute? I remember in the 3rd movie, Neo and Trinity take a joyride above the scorched clouds. There is still sunlight, and that means there is plenty of potential solar power for the machines to utilize if they wanted it. How so? They could have easily constructed towers that were higher than the scorched troposphere. These towers could have had solar panels on them. And therefore the entire idea of machines needing people to power their people-cities makes absolutely no sense.

Unless…what if the machines are trying to learn…something?

People and our cities are a form of computer system as well. And that means we can solve problems.

I think that if we were really in a matrix right now, the machines would be keeping us around to see if communion with man and machine is possible. Is it possible to love a machine and not care about the inner workings?

Maybe these AI computers are secretly little smoochers.

Speaking of smoochers. You’re not going to believe what this girl said to me.

There are a couple girls that I’m not really interested in, but I’ve been reading more Buddhist texts and one of them was talking about Eunuchs and how I guess the reason why Buddha took a wife is because if he was a Eunuch then people wouldn’t take him seriously. And after reading that sutra, I thought to myself, “Hey! Maybe I should get back into the dating scene.”

So I asked a different girl what I should say to these girls next time I see them at their jobs. And she said that she would never date anyone who talked to her while she was working.

WHAT?

I asked why. She said that its weird and then she told me this long story about someone who she knew who went to a Japanese restaurant and it all went downhill.

Then I told my friend, “There you go.”

I guessed it. I already knew that I personally was on the fence. And she just sealed the deal. So I’m not going to talk to these girls. I can’t mess up good reading spots anyway.

That’s something you’ll learn. If you find a place where you can read, that is king. Don’t sacrifice that for anything. I was only considering asking people out because I thought I could keep the reading spot AND find a life companion. But no way am I going to toss out a spot that lets me burn through 50+ pages of non-fiction books in one sitting. Sorry folks.

PS: Don’t forget to max out your inventory booster skill early on in Deus Ex: Human Revolution. Being able to carry more stuff makes the game much more enjoyable.

-Tyler

*SHARE*

February 24, 2014

James Gleick makes Chaos accessible to All

Filed under: Book Reviews — Tyler @ 10:43 am
Distorted Fractal

Distorted Fractal

James Gleick in 1987 wrote an outstanding book called, Chaos: Making a New Science. The ISBN is: 0-7493-8606-1 and it has been a joy to read.

After finally finishing the book today, I have a few thoughts.

First, the book makes fractals easy to understand. If I ever had any questions about what the Mandelbrot Set was about…then they have been surely answered. You’ll find out how Chaos is not just about disorder. There have been entire teams of people all around the world with different questions related to their specific fields.

Some scientists had questions about discrepancies in meteorological data, others found intricacies in population growth that seemed strange when plotted on a graph. But all of these scientists discovered recurring themes that actually have a serious impact on today’s techn0logy.

For example, encryption and data compression owe a tremendous amount of respect to the pioneers of chaos theory. Their work relating to chaos and “noise” allows for error checking that permits rapid transmission of data over the internet. Without their work, the foundations for advanced digital communication wouldn’t be where it is today.

Not only does the book deal with specific technological triumphs, but it also discusses the difficult process by which rogue scientists trail-blazed a new field of technology. It was not all props and applause for the initial explorers of dynamic systems and strange attractors. Many of the teams in Santa Cruz and other facilities used their own time, money and they scrounged and scavenged for laboratory equipment. Even after making serious breakthroughs, it was a difficult path for the scientists to gain recognition from a reluctant scientific community.

The patterns and concepts brought about by studying Chaos allowed people to understand things like how no snowflakes are exactly the same…and yet they all have distinct similarities. Ideas about how capillary systems are similar to river systems no longer was the realm of artists and poets. They were discovering the rules of bifurcation, iteration and most importantly change.

This book is not a difficult math book. James Gleick presents the information in a narrative and relaxed tone. You’ll read through the pages as if you were reading a good fiction book or a piece of poetry. Because this information is quite beautiful. The words and analogies Gleick uses to discuss the material is nothing short of beautiful and there are even some amazing fractal diagrams that will give hours of entertainment.

-Tyler

 

January 11, 2014

George Shultz lays the Smack Down Beyond the Headlines

Filed under: Book Reviews,Society Today — Tyler @ 12:59 pm
Economic Policy Beyond the Headlines is a great book

Economic Policy Beyond the Headlines is a great book

George P. Shultz is a professor at Stanford with a list of qualifications that can give someone eye-strain. He and his buddy Kenneth W. Dam wrote a straight-up awesome book on economics called, Economic Policy Beyond the Headlines. The ISBN for this book is: 0-226-75599-1 and I think you’ll love it.

When reading the book, you’ll easily notice that Shultz comes from the perspective of a pro-free market and globalization background. His experience in working with world leaders and his words on the post WWII economics of the USA definitely look forward to less protectionist systems on imports and exports.

Yet what is extremely interesting with this book, is how even though one might say Economic Policy Beyond the Headlines is pro-globalization…the book has many things in common with many anti-globalization books that I’ve read and reviewed such as, Alternatives to Economic Globalization.

These two books at first seemed completely contradictory to each other and I was finding it entertaining to read the differences in socioeconomic ideology. But as I read more of Shultz’s words, it became obvious that both sides of the spectrum are dealing with similar issues.

Where Alternatives to Economic Globalization discussed how poor and under-employed citizens bear the brunt of inflation…Shultz brings up the point of how a negative tax system would be more efficient than our current one.

This was very strange to read at first because a negative tax system has a “Robin Hood-esque” feel to it of steal from the rich and give to the poor. In other words, a negative tax seemed idealistic and fairy-land, pie in the sky and it would never get off the ground in our political climate.

Besides, I thought to myself, “Why would a globalist push for a negative tax in the first place? Is he a Democrat?”

And the answer comes very quickly. What Shultz puts forward is the idea that a negative tax would help compensate for inflation and add to the churning of the economy. This in his estimation would be more efficient than price controls.

I love how he brings up the fact of how bartering affects the tax system as a whole. When people barter, there’s no real paper trail and it’s hard to tax. So it makes sense for people to at least have SOME money to spend of things. How else is the legitimate tax system going to acquire any funds?

And if you think this is interesting…this subject is just a tiny…miniscule aspect of Economic Policy Beyond the Headlines. I’m telling you, you’re goona love this book.

Shultz brings up the whole gold standard issue with extreme methodical precision. It’s easy to follow along through all the facts of the Pre-Nixon era presidencies and how smaller decisions led to the larger monumental policy changes of the modern money system. It takes much of the oversimplification and cat & mouse vaudevillian antics out of all the crack-pot 3-minute descriptions of “why things are the way they are.”

One suggestion when reading this book is to not get tripped up on all the dates and details. The trick is to just read the book and let the facts wash over you and let them sink in. If you can’t remember a certain date or fact, don’t worry about looking everything up right then. When you have the time and if something is still irking you, go ahead and look up those concepts later. This uninterrupted reading style is part of a system I’ve developed called, Subconscious Reading Techniques which is one of my best and most popular articles which you can read HERE.

If you’re into the energy crisis and want to have some excellent concepts and facts to back up your argument on the Oil issues and energy research and development predicament of today…then Economic Policy Beyond the Headlines is the book for you. Although you have to wait for the later chapters to get to this subject matter, the amount of information is definitely worth it. I was again surprised to see how Shultz thinks the energy research progress in the USA is no where near where it should be. He often discusses how we aren’t capitalizing on our most abundant resource which is coal. Also, the book brings up how price controls on fuel and oil tends to have an adverse affect on energy research. This is because he says that by artificially keeping energy prices low, there is a negative incentive for private researchers to get in on the action. That’s a very interesting perspective and it helped me clear up the personal confusion I was having on why energy research is primarily handled by large universities which have government or big business backing.

Overall Economic Policy Beyond the Headlines is an outstanding read. Go and get your copy today.

-Tyler

December 14, 2013

Cyborgs vs Cybernetics and Cyberethics

Filed under: Book Reviews,Philosophy — Tyler @ 11:02 pm
Connections and Heuristics are the roots of Cybernetics...films portraying cyborgs don't give the whole picture

Connections and Heuristics are the roots of Cybernetics…films portraying cyborgs don’t give the whole picture

Yesterday, I finished reading an excellent book called, Alternatives to Economic Globalization (A Better World is Possible) which dealt with several important issues. Easily my favorite aspect of the book was the final set of chapters which focused on environmentally friendly solutions to economic needs and problems. This has been a major focus in my own research and even though this book was written in 2002…the concepts discussed in these final chapters were applicable today.

Before I delve too deeply into that subject, I want to discuss a concept that has been misconstrued in the media. It’s the idea of cyborgs. The term cyborg immediately brings forth ideas like Terminator robots and Robocops into someone mind. But these beings have actually very little to do with modern cybernetics. And when the subject of cyberethics is brought up, murderous robots tend to mess up the entire mental equation. And people are quick to dismiss concepts like cyberethics simply because of their names.

This is extremely unfortunate because cyberethics is one of the most important concepts when discussing and discovering new methods for environmental sustainability and innovation.

Let’s define these key terms so that this article has a strong foundation for deeper understanding of cyberethics and its potential for saving lives and money in our modern world.

First cybernetics is a term which is primarily concerned with systems that have active feedback mechanisms. One example of a cybernetic system would be a system of checks and balances within a healthy nation-state government. For example, in the United States of America, we have a Judicial, Legislative and Executive branches of government. These branches of government attempt to perpetuate the existence of that very government by making nation-state level decisions, creating laws and enforcing/interpreting those laws. If one branch of government becomes incapable of handling a problem, the other branches receive feedback from the media, public opinion, other lawmakers, civil disobedience which threatens the perpetuity of the government and of course many other mechanisms which exist in modern society.

The thing to remember is that cybernetics does not have to be about something related to computers.

Cyberethics takes cybernetics to a whole new level. Cyberethics is a way of thinking which puts heuristics feedback systems, resource optimization, and survival factors at the forefront of system creation. If one was to design a house with cyberethics in mind, he or she would probably want to make the most energy-efficient, good-looking and comfortable house possible.

In the book Alternatives to Economic Globalization, the authors bring up examples of South American cities which have low carbon footprints and high standards of living. I truly enjoyed reading about these examples and applaud the mayors and citizens which make such accomplishments possible.

But guess what? The year isn’t 2002 anymore.

In fact, 2014 is just around the corner. When I talk to people around town, no one really says, “Yep, it’s 2014. Who cares?”

Sorry, almost everyone I talk to says something like this, “Wow, I can’t believe it’s 2014 already. Time really flies.”

Why is this?

Has our perception of time changed in our modern society? Is saying time flies a simple politically correct conversation starter? I think there is much more to this than we think.

In the book Alternatives to Economic Globalization there is a constant recurring theme of taking power back from corporations and giving it to small-scale ownership and small-scale responsibility.

Even though the writers are absolutely correct, that small-scale environments are more energy efficient and environmentally friendly…they’re missing one important fact. Big corporations aren’t going to give up their place in the world without a fight. And since big corporations have wealth, influence, support systems, financial leverage, political inroads and many other methods to maintain their power…most of the first half of the book is just absolutely correct yet wishful thinking. It’s nothing personal but get real.

The reason why large corporations and large fossil fuel consuming countries are slow to change is because they’re big. Big things are heavy, big things move slowly. Why would governments and corporations be any different?

“If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it!” Have you ever heard that before?

Well, in the bureaucratic sectors the motto is, “If it is broke, but if it still makes somebody money…then you’ll need to get approval to fix it because that’s your issue and I’m not putting my position on the line to help you. PS: This wasn’t my fault anyway, the problem originated from the other sector which is the root cause.”

It’s just a game of Pass the Bean and it’s not meant to frustrate people. It’s just the way things work in the real world. Well, the real world for many large sectors of business and government that is…but things are slowly changing day by day. And the root cause of that has to do with the bottom line.

As markets become saturated and consumable resources become more scarce, bureaucrats are faced with tough choices. It’s kind of like how treasure troves of old precious coins are reported to be found in dead people’s houses every few years in the local newspapers. It always happens because somewhere, someone was hording a whole bunch of something. And they weren’t doing much with it either…just collecting it. It happens all the time.

The problem is that the very act of hording something valuable without a way to circulate and grow wealth within a system can cause unhealthy behaviors on multiple levels. The Alternatives to Economic Globalization book touches on this when it discusses dependence on foreign oil and the support systems required to keep this system in place including wars etc. It’s a really good point because since our demand is so ridiculously high for a certain product, support industries can be drastically affected by changes in both consumption and production of something like oil.

One of my favorite movies is “Chain Reaction” with Morgan Freeman and Keanu Reeves. In this film a group of scientists and researchers come up with a way to use sonoluminescence in order to create excess energy. But Morgan Freeman’s character warns the chief scientist that the world wasn’t ready for this technology to become public so he had the scientists killed. (It’s not a spoiler this happens in the beginning of the movie so calm down.)

This makes sense: Large systems are the most vulnerable to rapid change.

But here’s the problem…actually it is less of a problem than it is an opportunity.

The advent of the open source movement in conjunction with the internet has allowed innovators to simple solve problems on their own or in small groups. If you don’t like something in your world. Change it. If you want to see more of something that isn’t in your world. Make it.

Use search engines aggressively. Use video repositories aggressively. If you are the kind of person who is comfortable with social networking, use it the maximum to learn what you need to know…and then promote your work to make a difference.

Alternative to Economic Globalization came out in 2002 and there wasn’t even a fraction of a the amount of information on the internet as there is now. So of course this book is going to use more of a “protest and force reform” type of solution to modern economic problems. But we are in an entirely different world now.

I wanted to learn Actionscript 3.0 back in 2004, so I bought 2 books and learned the programming language.

Now I want to learn Android development so I studied and completed the Javascript tutorials on Codecademy.com and I’m watching the video series below that deals directly with Android development and how it uses Java. I thought that Java would be a big jump away from Actionscript and Javascript and honestly…it isn’t that bad. It’s just a little bit more complicated with more tools, cogs and key-terms. But it is definitely within reach.

What we’re talking about is crafting our own retirements. Cleaning our environments by not being satisfied by the status-quo. Instead we can challenge our own lethargy and learn more than one profession in a lifetime. No one should make fun of someone for being a family man and doing the same job for 60 years. And on the same note no one should mock a dreamer who tries out several different jobs and professions. We all have our place in modern society and it is growing and becoming stronger every day because of our ability to share our adventures!

So feel good about yourself and realize that we have much more in common with each other than we think. We all want extra bucks in the pocket. We all want to feel safe and satisfied. That is completely normal and realistic. The trick is share ideas which can save innovators time…and sharing friendly support which can inspire perseverance and productivity!

Thank you so much for reading and have an excellent week.

-Tyler

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress