overidon.com Central Database for Overidon Omnimedia

April 18, 2011

Forcing change in bad computer behavior

Filed under: Innovation — Tyler @ 11:22 pm

I have this bad habit of putting my right hand in a position where I’m in a constant “stress” position while holding the mouse. This is because I want to always be able to quickly scroll with the middle mouse button up and down on webpages. So I tend to arch the front of my hand in a way where my hand is hovering slightly above the front of the mouse. This enables me to constantly be able to scroll, without needing to pause even for a second. It is a terrible habit and now I’m feeling the beginning of pain that I’ve been able to successfully attribute to this bad habit. If I kept this behavior up, I would have easily developed some sort of repetitive motion or early arthritis problem.

So what I did earlier today, was that I changed a setting on my mouse that made it so the right and left mouse buttons were switched. This made it so left clicking became a right click and vise-versa. But it didn’t stop there. I then switched the mousepad from being on the right hand side of my keyboard to the left hand side of my keyboard. The next step was to move the mouse itself to the left hand side.

As you can see, I’m now using my mouse with my left hand. It is quite awkward, but not bad enough to impair my speed of navigating my computer. And it is definitely making me slow down when using the computer in the department of how I hold the mouse. The reality is that I basically said to myself, “If I can’t break this bad habit with my right hand, then my right hand is going to loose computer mouse privileges for a few weeks and we’ll see how things go.”

Just a few hours with using the mouse in a different hand plus going to writer’s group has been a serious relief to my right hand. By no means am I ambidextrous yet, but I’m curious to see if there will be any hemispheric brain activity increases or perspective changes as a result of this simple variation in a daily behavior.

I remember trying to pass the bass in Waterpolo was extremely difficult at first, but after practicing for years, well…it was still hard, but it improved my control when I used my right hand.

Sometimes comfort zones can create efficiency but can also put the mind and muscles into routines that have detrimental effects on the entire body as a system.

It is interesting, after I typed that last sentence, I took a break and thought about what I was going to write next. But when I did that, I kept my left hand on the keyboard, (I write with both hands, using pretty much every finger) and I let my right hand rest on my right leg. The reason why I bring this up, is because when I would use the mouse in my right hand, in a similar situation my left hand would have been the one taking a break on my left leg. So it is worthwhile to mention that there has already been collateral behavioral change as a result of this relatively new habitual change.

-Tyler

*SHARE*

April 17, 2011

Rough Concept for Desal and Coal Plant combo

Filed under: Innovation — Tyler @ 8:28 pm

Here’s my quick concept for a Desalinization Plant and Coal Power Plant combination.

1) Take a coal power plant and plug the smoke stacks into a kelp/algae Tiered Vertical Wafer Farm System.

2) Take a desalinization plant and plug that into the coal power plant and also in the Tiered Vertical Wafer Algae System (TVWAS).

3a) A TVWAS is a building that has different levels. On each level there are thin layers of water pools that are set up to receive the input of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) into the water. There is a layer of algae and or kelp that uses the CO2 in each pool or wafer to grow and reproduce and basically eat the CO2 as best as the algae can.

3b) There are processes described on Wikipedia that discuss scrubbing the Sulfur and other non CO2 out of the coal so that would need to be done before the CO2 hits the TVWAS.

3c) The TVWAS would get the water it needs for the wafers from the byproduct partially brine water from the Desal Plant.

This is just a rough concept. I’ll add more to this later. There are some problems with it, especially zoning and other things. But I really like to idea of using critters to absorb CO2. Also the algae when it blooms to densely in the wafers could be used for other purposes. Some of those uses could be for adding already made blooms of algae into desert regions of the ocean. I’m not sure if the algae could be used for food, but perhaps it could be used for fertilizer or some other purpose.

 

UPDATE – April 30th, 2011:  There is a new diagram related to this rough concept – CLICK HERE to view.

-Tyler Jaggers
Copyright 2011 overidon.com

April 11, 2011

Reforestation of the United States of America

Filed under: Innovation — Tyler @ 3:37 pm
forest

Forest in South America

There are three interesting trends in the United States of America, that have synergistic potential to do something great for this country…reforestation. At first glance, these trends may seem alarming and forebode the worst for our future, but when we look at them in conjunction with one another, they present opportunities. These opportunities would not have been logistically feasible if it were not for the existence of the problems themselves. The first trend is that costs of fuel and other basic products are increasing without a tremendous increase in the average wages of wage laborers when inflation is taken into account. It doesn’t really matter if this trend is a manufactured trend, or if it is a real transition based on previously establish social and economic systems. The effect of this trend has very real results.

When the costs of fuel goes up, and if purchasing power stays the same or gets worse, then mobility decreases. This makes it so people need to make serious decisions on where they work, where they play, and how far they are willing to travel to get there. So the second trend is that people are starting to move closer to the cities. Sometimes people consider moving directly into cities that may have seemed less than ideal in previous decades.

The reason for this influx into the cities is because it makes zero sense to spend twenty dollars a day in fuel just to get to work, if you only make 100 dollars a day. That means you spent one-fifth of your time at work just to pay for your gasoline. It is ridiculous at best.

But with the influx of jobs and people moving into urban areas, there is often an increase in demand for fresh fruits and vegetables. Even though not all city dwellers can usually afford to pay for higher quality food-stuffs, many of the executives and self-employed individuals are willing to pay top dollar for their food. This is especially true in areas where people are health and/or physical appearance conscious.

So the first trend was the increase of fuel prices and the stagnation of wage laborers’ wages, and the second was the movement into cities and demand for high quality vegetables and fruits. But the third trend is not quite as apparent, but nonetheless very real. It is an increase in the public discourse on the concept of Vertical Farms.

Quite simply, a big farm in a skyscraper in or near a city will require less fuel to transport the foodstuffs into that city.

Right now, many of the fruits and vegetables that are in the grocery store may travel between 50 and 1,000 miles or more to get there. It is a highly fuel-inefficient process that may not hold up under the increased stresses on fossil fuel prices.

But if the United States of America became more food independent on a city level, then what would happen to the huge horizontal farms in the center of the country?

There is a tremendous amount of debate on this subject. First of all, not all of the farms in the center of the USA will ever go away. They are just too profitable for agribusiness that export to other countries. And this helps with the trade imbalances that we are currently experiencing.

But that being said, if US cities profitably engaged in vertical farming, then there may not be a huge need for as many farms in the center of the country. So one thing that can happen with that land, is that private companies such as corporations and sole proprietorships can purchase the land. Or wealthy individual citizens could purchase the land. Once the land is acquired, the former farms can be converted into fallow grasslands, and in about 30 years or so, they can become the beginnings of forests.

Now you may be thinking, why would businesses or citizens want to literally invest billions of dollars and 30+ years just so there can be forests again the USA?

Well, the reason for this is that there are very subtle advantages that a nation-state can have if it has a large and bio-diverse forest system. One thing to consider is that in the South American rain forest, there are lots of plants and animals being born and dying all the time. This is a very normal cycle of life. But what happens to all the dead stuff? Quite simply, mushrooms eat the dead stuff, and feed the nutrients back into the soil and trees.

There are underground mushroom systems that span hundreds and even thousands of square miles. Nobody truly knows how dense the fungal filaments are, but your house or apartment may be built on top of one of these systems. These systems of mushrooms keep the balance of the rain forests and keep biodiversity expanding.

Now, it is very unlikely that a rain-forest could ever exist in the United States. But it is very likely, that given enough time, a large enough forest system with limited human interaction could become a mega-dense forest with high biodiversity.

The advantage of having a massive system of biodiversity within one’s own nation-state is that it has been proven time and time again, that there are billions upon billions of dollars worth of potential technology in the medical and other fields within dense forests. The denser the forest, the more potential for technology.

Extracting information from forests requires specialists and highly educated and/or trained people. And converting the information gathered into actual products and advancements, takes entire teams. So there is  huge employment potential.

But let’s not forget about the mushroom systems under the ground. Some people ascribe to a Gaia theory that the planet is alive and other stuff. Yet none of that really matters. There are mushrooms that want to recycle dead stuff. And if the citizens of the United States of America allow a dense forest system to exist in the middle of the country, the fungal system itself may actually reward us.

An obvious and very likely reward would be increased soil nutrients. But the ones that I am most interested are the more invisible ones. Since trees can effect weather patterns, due to how they control moisture levels, then our country could benefit from a greater forest. And since we know that the magnetic pole of the Earth is changing, there could be unknown positive consequences by allowing large ecosystems to live uninhibited by human beings within our very country.

-Tyler

SOURCES:

1) Formidable Fungus is World’s Largest Organism, by David Johnson, article posted December 7th, 200 – Article Retrieval: April 11th, 2011. LINK: http://www.infoplease.com/spot/fungus1.html

2) Vertical Farm, by By Sudhirendar Sharma, article posted Tuesday, Article Retrieval: April 12th, 2011. LINK: http://www.deccanherald.com/content/149914/vertical-farm.html

 

March 30, 2011

The Rate of Magnetic Pole Shift is increasing

Filed under: Innovation — Tyler @ 3:14 pm
magnet

magnet

The Earth’s Magnetic North Pole has literally shifted from Canada to Siberia (Russia).  According to Dr. Chris Connor during a news excerpt from NBC, he said, “…it’s been moving, and now it’s moved all the way from northern Canada into northern Siberia.” What it interesting is that Dr. Connor didn’t say what most websites and news sources are saying. Most sources I’ve read say that the Magnetic Pole is “shift-ING” to Siberia. But Dr. Connor very clearly says “moved.” This means that the pole is already in Siberia. The reason why this is worth discussing is because an article written in 2003 on the NASA website regarding Magnetic Fields, said that at the current rate of Magnetic Pole shift in 2003, the pole would move from North America to Siberia in “a few decades.” Now, when I hear the words, one decade, I think of 10 years. And a couple decades would mean around 20 years. But when I hear “a few decades” I definitely think of a minimum of 20 years, more in the ballpark of 21 to 60 years. This means that in 7 years, the magnetic poles have shifted what NASA predicted what would happen in a much longer period of time.

When I saw the movie, 2012 that starred John Cusack, I thought the scene where all the magnetic poles were shifting was an interesting Science-Fiction plot device. I never thought that this would actually happen in my lifetime. Although the film was highly stylized, the mere fact that the rate of pole shift is increasing is disconcerting at best.

-Tyler

SOURCES:

NBC News (Big thank you to NBC for broadcasting this excellent short piece on an interesting and important issue)

NASA: Earth’s Inconstant Magnetic Field, published December 29th, 2003. http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2003/29dec_magneticfield/

FoxNews.com: Ordinary Compasses Thrown Off by Changes in Earth’s Magnetic Field, written by Loren Grush, published February 25th, 2011. http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/02/25/ordinary-compasses-thrown-changes-earths-magnetic-field/

Wikipedia: North Magnetic Pole, retrieved March 30th, 2011. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Magnetic_Pole

 

 

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress