overidon.com Central Database for Overidon Omnimedia

February 21, 2011

Offline Facebook Status Updates

Filed under: Tyler's Mind — Tyler @ 11:55 pm
offline facebook status updates

click to ENLARGE

This article is about a form of Facebook participation. It involves being offline from the chat mode but posting jokes on one’s status anyway. This is great because you can tell everyone jokes and not have to reap the consequences of having people hurl insults via chat mode. I love this feature and I’m going to use it more often whenever I have a really good zinger. A few minutes ago I just asked the question: What kind of herb is the best at sports? And I bet lots of people are going to think about that one for a while and think of something sassy. But I can think of only a few people that are going to figure out the real answer. But since you read this article I’ll tell you.

Q: What kind of herb is the best at sports?

A: tournament

HAAH!!!

Ok. So you probably want to be Facebook friends immediately after hearing that, but hold on…there’s more!

Q: What is the most boring form of transportation?

A: zzzcopter

BOOM!

Dude I got more.

Q: What’s a walruses favorite dating site?

A: PlentyOfFish.com

Served. Don’t hang up yet.

My ex-girlfriend used to always buy designer pairs of jeans in two’s. There wasn’t a single time when she would buy just one. I guess that’s because of how much she liked to second-GUESS.

Ok. Fine, now you can add me.

-Tyler

Stealth camouflage and Disguise

Filed under: Innovation — Tyler @ 11:14 pm
Stealth Camouflage Disguise

Stealth Camouflage Disguise

There is more to stealth, camouflage and disguise than wavelengths of light and shadow. Several distinct factors of physics, biology and psychology make the successful shroud possible. The first way to approach a successful endeavor into non-detection would be to determine what method one will be observed with. For example, a Stealth Bomber, despite its name, would be easily detected visually if it was sitting still on an airfield surrounded by F-16’s. It would stick out like a sore thumb. But if a those planes were in the air, especially at night…the stealth bomber would be challenging to find visually and via radar. So it is important to establish, the setting and detection methods of the observer.

One possible explanation for the reason why most people can see many shades of green is interesting. People say that when early humans spent a great deal of time in forests, snakes were dangerous predators. The snakes were camouflaged by their color and patterns on their scaly skin. So the people that survived hunting and foraging in the forests were the ones that were able to distinguish snakes from the green foliage. Eventually people with better eyesight, especially in seeing differences in many shades of green were able to pass down their genes. And over time green became a color that most people can see great variance in.

So the snakes were technically using two different forms of stealth. First they had their primary color, which in many cases was green. And this helped them to blend in with their environments. The second form was their spots or colored shapes on their skin. These worked as a form of camouflage which works in conjunction with the base color but does something entirely different. The base color is an attempt to compensate for creatures that are scanning a jungle or terrain quickly. If you don’t look closely you won’t be able to notice the snake.

But the pattern camouflage is interesting because it tricks the mind into thinking that one thing is something that it is not. So camouflage is a more active than base color. Many soldiers use camouflage in order to decrease their visibility in the battlefield. But the more complicated the camouflage, the more terrain-specific it becomes.

But stealth is more than simply how things appear. Movement is a huge part of stealth. And usually it is relative. You can always pick a perpetrator out of a crowd when he is being chased by the police, because he is usually running and everyone else is not.

Panhandlers on busy street corners are easily visible because they are the only ones standing still. Someone carrying a sign on a sidewalk while walking in times square would blend into the crowd and probably would be ignored more than if he/she was stationary.

But we have just discussed visual stealth. There is stealth of sound as well. By walking on one’s tip toes, you make less sound. Unless of course if you are on your tip toes because you are wearing high-heels. Then one would probably make a great deal of noise.

Actually there is stealth for all the different senses one can think of. It doesn’t really matter if we are talking about visual or auditory, or even sent based stealth. The main thing to think of is that stealth is related to lowering one’s relative vibration level. It is all about not standing out.

Disguise, on the other hand is entirely different. It implies that one is trying to conceal an identity, by having a different appearance. The important thing to think about is that although appearance may imply that we are only talking about visual appearance. It doesn’t necessarily have to be that way. By simply changing someone’s inflection and using a blocked number, one can sound like an entirely different person on the phone. A change of cologne can make someone think that you feel differently about that person’s company. So disguise is focused on change.

Celebrities wear disguises all the time in order to avoid paparazzi. People grow beards, wear hats, and sometimes even prosthetic limbs.

But there is a special circumstance that combines many of these discussed methods of detection avoidance: Well timed honesty.

Someone being honest with his or her intentions or identity can have catastrophic consequences when they are forced to reveal them, under harsh scrutiny. But if those very same intentions are disseminated over a calculated period of time, people and organizations can become desensitized to them.

Let’s do a thought experiment.

Imagine Walter frequents his local coffee shop quite often. And every other time he goes to get his Latte, he mentions how much he loves gorillas and mentions some kind of interesting fact on gorilla lifestyles or physiology. Over time, the staff will become accustomed to listening to his gorilla info for the day and won’t think twice about it. Maybe even a barista may ask Walter about gorillas when he forgets to bring them up for a few days.

After a year of this behavior, Walter walks into the coffee shop wearing a gorilla suit.

Most of the staff, will probably guess that the person is Walter, playing a joke or going to a party and they will not call the police.

They might even ask Walter in his gorilla suit if he wants a banana smoothie as a joke.

The repetitive honesty of Walter, desensitized the coffee shop staff to the concept of him in conjunction with gorillas.

Now imagine if Walter doesn’t like gorillas and he never talked about them. Actually in this scenario, Walter is a huge fan of Jazz music. So every day he talks about Thelonious Monk and other famous Jazz musicians.

And after a year of constantly bringing up Jazz…Walter walks into the coffee shop wearing a gorilla suit.

You can see that the staff would be very shocked, especially if it wasn’t a holiday like Halloween.

So there is a form of power in honesty. But it is all about the timing and repetition of the information.

The shroud of honesty.

-Tyler

If you enjoyed this article – here is another on Invisibility and Energy Frequencies HERE

February 20, 2011

The Fallacy of Vegetable Suffering

Filed under: Observations — Tyler @ 9:12 pm

The whole concept of fruits and vegetables experiencing suffering when they are eaten is flawed for several reasons. Some people have postulated that vegetarians should feel guilt for eating vegetables because they either experience discomfort or else that they do not wish to be eaten. Many carnivores use this fallacy in order to justify that eating meat is equally or even more humane than being vegetarian.

The first reason why the vegetable argument is a fallacy is because vegetables, although they are living entities, being eaten is an i
important part of their life-cycles.

Let’s look at berries. Berries of different types are often eaten by birds. The edible berries are swallowed by the birds. But since it takes time for birds to digest the berries when they fly to a new area, the seeds are deposited in a new area in the bird guano. The guano is usually comprised of nutrients that are beneficial to the seeds. So every dropping that has a seed in it has the potential to turn into a berry bush.

The berries being eaten by the birds helps the bush to reproduce. The fruit technically if it had feelings would be happy that they are eaten.

Now you may be thinking, “That explains fruit. But what about vegetables? Not all vegetables have seeds.” That is a valid concern. Since the edible parts of carrots are not seeds, for example. Well, in an attempt to not oversimplify but to get to the point nevertheless, many vegetables greatly benefit from interaction from other creatures. Some vegetables can reproduce through flowering or by splitting from itself and growing into multiple new plants. But having creatures eat the tubers of a potato or the taproot of a carrot increases the likelihood that the plant will have fertile soil in their direct vicinity.

If creatures are eating lots of vegetables and making droppings all over the place, the soil will benefit. Therefore vegetables almost require themselves to be eaten ever once in a while for it’s ecosystem to achieve maximum reproductive potential.

So now that we discussed the scientific aspect of the vegetable suffering fallacy, let’s evaluate it’s philosophical postulations. Couldn’t meat consumption in nature be supported by the same argument of ecosystem survival? For animals eat meat and that can cull beards from growing out of control. And this can also lead to soil nutrients. But one fact remains, and that is that most vertebrate, animals have pain receptors.

Pain receptors are usually connected to a nerve cord or spinal cord which ties into the animal brain. So these receptors tell the brain that it is experiencing pain or discomfort. And the brain can interpret this information along with any fear that it experiencing and the animal can suffer.

Compound the pain with captivity of animals and unfortunate living conditions and one can imagine that some animals experience a great deal of suffering before they die.

Therefore meat does create more suffering than vegetables.

-Tyler

February 19, 2011

analysis of Would You Hold it Against Me

Filed under: Observations — Tyler @ 4:57 pm

The new Britney Spears music video “Would You Hold it Against Me” has multiple layers of interesting meaning. There is intriguing social commentary throughout the song and the visual production. The first noticeable thing is that the meteor in the beginning is at first feared but when it actually hits the earth it creates color instead of destruction.

This implies that the impending concerns about modern times are necessary yet the results will be unexpected. It is clear that Britney is discussing current modern times because it says in futuristic font that the year was 2011.

As the video progresses we see males put on their pants while wearing purple underwear. The interesting thing to note is that these individuals are wearing briefs instead of boxers. So we can infer that the type of dancing that is about to occur is going to be strenuous. And contol will trump comfort or a temperate environment.

We notice that Britney is in a cylindrical room made of advanced technology. There is a tremendous amount of wiring and flat panel monitors. This is symbolic of the extreme state of media and self-inflicted over-stimulation.

Later in the video those very monitors display brief images of Britney when she was in the beginning hay-day of her career. It is quite fitting that this occurs during the Dub Step breakdown of the song. There is great deal of tension and stress during this segment and women that look like Britney are fighting with each other highly stylistically. The long scarves are emblematic that even during times of great self-conflict, a level of grace must be maintained.

One thing to note is that the song is quite good and the excellent direction of the video combined with the music warrants analysis.

Another curious costume decision was the idea of using paint dispensers quite literraly at “Britney’s fingertips” their significance has two dimensions. First the paint tubes are aligned with Britney Spears’ hand and finger veins. This implies that she is expelling her own blood or life force over all the technology and attention, including her former fame and existence as a young woman. Her dress is streaked with rainbows of blood. Even though the paint/blood scene appears to be central, it is eclipsed by the much more subtle scene when Britney is navigating PlentyOfFish.com.

Many peole may think this is a simple “plug” but it is in fact a powerful suggestion for touch screen technology used in conjunction with modern desktop computers. A roadmap for sure because people are already familiarized with the techniques of dragging and squeezing the screen via iPhones and iPads and the like. The beauty of the short scene is that it showed a keyboard at the same time. This opposed to using a virtual on-screen keyboard. Anyone who has used both types of keyboards knows that although virtual keyboards are convenient, it is much more efficient to use an actual keyboard with plastic buttons.

So the scene suggests using well known technology (the keyboard) in conjunction with cutting edge touch screen technology. The end result is stimulating the viewer in the desire for a new market of flat screen technology for desktop use. We will want to interact with the screen physically as both a status and functionality aspect. The fact that she is navigating a dating site is no where near as consequential as the closeup on the “SONY” logo at the bottom of the monitor.

Later in the video the male dancers change from people with eyes into technologically aggressive characters that are reminiscent of the modern conception of Cobra Commander. They are significantly more dangerous looking. This implies that the reinvented Britney has a clan of support that has evolved. The men have eyes and their mouths are covered. Speakers destroy themselves from the sheer power exerted by the music.

-Tyler

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress